Decision rights before pilots start.

14 years inside K-12 technology leadership. AI governance advisory for districts ready to build the right structures before the pilot starts.

Advisory Services

  • A structured assessment of your district’s readiness to adopt AI in non-instructional operations. Evaluates decision rights, accountability structures, organizational readiness, and risk before a pilot begins.

  • A facilitated working session for superintendents and cabinet leaders to establish AI governance priorities, clarify decision rights, and build alignment before adoption decisions are made.

  • A structured workshop for board members covering AI governance responsibilities, policy considerations, and the questions boards should be asking before approving AI initiatives.

  • Ongoing advisory support for districts that need a dedicated AI governance resource without a full-time hire. Includes regular strategy sessions, framework guidance, and decision support as AI initiatives evolve.

  • Project-based support for districts evaluating AI vendors. Brings an independent perspective to the assessment process, focused on organizational fit, accountability structures, and whether the vendor understands your environment as well as their own product.

The Governance Gap Is Organizational, Not Technical.

I spent 14 years inside K-12 technology leadership watching the same failure patterns repeat across every kind of technology deployment. The technology worked. The organizational structures around it frequently did not. Nobody had defined who owned the decision, who carried the accountability, or what the organization would do when something went wrong. I built the AI Governance Framework for Operational Adoption to address that gap before districts repeat those same mistakes with AI.

Start a Conversation